The passwordless landscape has shifted materially since this page was first written. Three developments are worth calling out:
The net effect is that “passwordless” in 2026 is not one thing. It ranges from magic links and one-time passcodes (which are convenient but still phishable) to passkeys and FIDO2 hardware keys (which are phishing-resistant). For enterprise use, and especially for privileged accounts, the direction is unambiguous: FIDO2 and passkeys.
LoginTC supports both FIDO2 hardware security keys and passkeys for on-premises Active Directory, Windows Logon, RDP, RADIUS-based VPN and firewall access, and cloud applications. This includes AuthenTrend ATKey.Pro, ATKey.Card NFC, and Dongwoon Anatech Fingerprint Card, plus any other FIDO2-certified device.
Passwordless authentication can be achieved in many ways including:
The second tier of passwordless authentication methods aren’t necessarily bad; they’re just arguably not completely passwordless. These three methods are:
The way passwordless authentication works is by replacing passwords with other authentication factors that are essentially safer. With password-based authentication, a user-provided password is matched against what is stored in the database.
In some passwordless systems, such as biometric authentication, the comparison happens is similar but instead of passwords, a user’s distinctive characteristics are compared. For example, a system captures a user’s face using facial recognition, it then extracts numerical data from it, and then compares it with verified data present in the database.
Other passwordless implementations include sending a one-time passcode to a user’s mobile, via SMS.
Passwordless authentication relies on the same principles as digital certificates such as a cryptographic key pair with a private and public key. Think of the public key as the padlock and the private key as the actual key that unlocks it.
Digital certificates work in a way in which there is only one key for the padlock and only one padlock for the key. A user wishing to create a secure account uses a tool (a mobile app, a browser extension, etc.) to generate a public-private key pair.
The private key is stored on the user’s local device and can only be accessed using an authentication factor, e.g., a fingerprint, PIN, or OTP. The public key is provided to the system on which the user wishes to have a secure account.
Depending on your definition of safe, that will determine whether passwordless authentication is safe. If you mean safe as harder to crack and less prone to the most common cyber attacks, then yes, passwordless authentication is considered safe.
If your definition of safe is protected from hacking, then no, it’s not safe. There’s no authentication system out there which can’t be hacked. There may not be an obvious way to hack, but that doesn’t mean that the most sophisticated hackers can’t work their way around its defenses.
Passwordless techniques are generally safer than passwords. To hack a password-based system, a bad actor may use a textbook attack, which is often considered the most basic hacking technique (keep trying different passwords until you get a match).
Even amateur hackers can perform a textbook attack. On the contrary, it takes a significantly higher level of hacking experience and sophistication to infiltrate a passwordless system.
A smoother and more convenient customer experience
Recovered revenue from reduced customer attrition
Dramatically improved security that eliminates the threat vector of passwords
Long-term savings from the lower total cost of operation and reduce infrastructure
Significantly decreased complexity in the identity stack, making it easier to add and manage elements
Simple authentication methods that require only username and password combinations are inherently vulnerable. Attackers can guess or steal credentials and gain access to sensitive information and IT systems using a variety of techniques, including:
Here’s how to approach implementing passwordless authentication:
Passwordless authentication simply replaces passwords with a more suitable authentication factor. On the other hand, MFA (multi-factor authentication) uses more than one authentication factor to verify a user’s identity.
Multi-factor authentication is a term used to describe authentication that requires two or more factors. Normally, this includes both a one-time passcode and a regular password.
Many passwordless solutions use some form of multi-factor authentication (MFA), to prevent threat actors from stealing and using the device associated with a passwordless account. To achieve MFA without a complicated authentication process, device fingerprinting provides a second, invisible factor that ensures only registered devices can be authenticated. When you combine biometrics with device fingerprinting, it is effectively impossible for a hacker to impersonate a user. While technically passwordless, it still adds an extra layer of protection than just a password.
The primary reason why passwords are still being used is because a password-based login system is the easiest and the cheapest to implement. However, it is expected that passwordless authentication will take over soon.
In the last two years, there have been more cyberattacks than ever before. This is setting off alarm bells in many companies, with more and more investments being made into biometrics and adaptive authentication.
Many companies have now realized that only using passwords as a form of authentication is the primary reason for data breaches. The cost of implementing passwordless authentication into their organization is nothing compared to the fines and losses incurred due to a data breach.
Last but not least, passwords are a nuisance for users. Hard to remember and a pain to reset. On the other hand, passwordless techniques, like biometrics, are convenient and much more user-friendly.
Passwordless authentication verifies a user’s identity without a password. Instead of a shared secret, the user presents a possession factor (a hardware security key or a phone with a passkey) or an inherence factor (a fingerprint or face scan). Passwordless methods rely on public-key cryptography, so there is no password to phish, guess, or steal from a database breach.
A passkey is a FIDO2 credential that lets a user sign in with the same biometric or PIN they use to unlock their phone or laptop. Passkeys can be device-bound (limited to a single device for maximum security) or synced across the user’s ecosystem (for convenience). Passkeys are phishing-resistant because they cryptographically verify the domain the user is signing into before releasing the credential.
Not exactly. Passwordless replaces the password. MFA (multi-factor authentication) requires two or more factors, at least one of which is not a password. Modern passwordless methods like passkeys are inherently multi-factor because the user has to prove both possession (of the device) and either biometric (fingerprint or face) or knowledge (a PIN) to unlock the credential.
The main categories are FIDO2 hardware security keys (physical devices the user taps), passkeys (device-bound or synced FIDO2 credentials on phones and laptops), biometric authentication (fingerprint or face scans), and certificate-based authentication. Magic links and one-time passcodes are sometimes called passwordless but are still phishable, so they do not qualify as phishing-resistant.
FIDO2 and passkeys are phishing-resistant. They cryptographically verify the domain the user is on before releasing the credential, which defeats fake-login-page and adversary-in-the-middle attacks. Magic links, one-time passcodes, and push notifications without number matching are not phishing-resistant, even though they are often called passwordless.
NIST SP 800-63-4 (finalized July 2025) explicitly recognizes FIDO2 and passkeys as phishing-resistant authenticators suitable for federal systems. Combined with OMB Memorandum M-22-09, which requires phishing-resistant MFA for federal agencies, the U.S. federal direction is now unambiguously toward FIDO2 and passkeys.
Yes. FIDO2 hardware security keys perform authentication locally on the key itself, with no network dependency, so they work in fully offline and air-gapped environments. Combined with LoginTC Managed (fully on-premises), the entire authentication stack can operate without any external network connection.
LoginTC supports FIDO2 hardware security keys and passkeys for on-premises Active Directory, Windows Logon, RDP, RADIUS-based VPN and firewall access, and cloud applications. Organizations typically transition in stages: password plus phishing-resistant MFA first, then passwordless for privileged users, then passwordless as the default for the broader workforce. LoginTC supports every stage on the same platform.
Ready to move your organization toward passwordless?
Talk to our team about a phased transition from password-only sign-in to phishing-resistant FIDO2 and passkeys. LoginTC supports on-premises, cloud, and hybrid deployments.